RotorBlog.com - Latest Comments in Rarhost – free rar file hosting

Re: Rarhost – free rar file hosting

Vps Hosting — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 02:24:23 -0000

I like this file hosting service, I think they have aim a very specific market. Just like www.vpswebserver.com that aim market for VPS Hosting.

Re: Rarhost – free rar file hosting

kasim — Wed, 27 Aug 2008 19:18:34 -0000

i am waiting for getting this file
please help me whith it

Re: Rarhost – free rar file hosting

kasim — Wed, 27 Aug 2008 19:16:34 -0000

i need winrar
can some one sent to me
kasimalzaidi2000@yahoo.com

Re: Rarhost – free rar file hosting

Manny — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 21:30:40 -0000

Interesting niche haven't seen this before good luck on it tho..

Best Regards
Mannt http://filehostcenter.com Free Image and File Hosting

Re: Rarhost – free rar file hosting

Peter — Sat, 21 Apr 2007 16:58:21 -0000

I really enjoyed reading your post, it was really outstanding. I only wish my posts were as informative.

regards
Piro @ www.clickonsend.com for free unlimited file and image hosting

Re: Rarhost – free rar file hosting

TinyLoad — Tue, 06 Mar 2007 20:20:13 -0000

TinyLoad.com also offers free file hosting - RARs included, with unlimited bandwidth, and unlimited downloads.

Re: Rarhost – free rar file hosting

Mandy — Wed, 27 Sep 2006 08:35:06 -0000

It's a good concept. They find their niche market, but I think it is nothing different than other file hosting providers.

I just discover www.misterupload.com a file hosting provider with download speed. I cannot say Rapidshare etc. still have good download speed, maybe only when you subscribe for a little fee. But in my opinion Misterupload.com still offer great speed with no limitations.

Re: Rarhost – free rar file hosting

soxiam — Wed, 16 Aug 2006 16:25:34 -0000

Absolutely agree. It's a nice concept and useful for few, but it's not designed to become popular. The barrier of entry is too high. Not everyone is going to even know what .rar format is. They're playing in a niche market they created for themselves for their own reasons and perhaps forgot to ask what's in it for the users.