<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>RotorBlog.com - Latest Comments in Twingly Presents Blog Rank and Top 100 Blogs</title><link>http://rotorblog.disqus.com/</link><description>Social media blog</description><atom:link href="https://rotorblog.disqus.com/twingly_presents_blog_rank_and_top_100_blogs/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 02:28:04 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Twingly Presents Blog Rank and Top 100 Blogs</title><link>http://www.rotorblog.com/2008/12/16/twingly-presents-blog-rank-and-top-100-blogs/#comment-11090600</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i use the service ://URLFAN which to me is more transparent in regards to "ranking websites".  Their top 100 is pretty well respected in the web 2.0 world:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.urlfan.com/site/top_100/100.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.urlfan.com/site/top_100/100.html"&gt;http://www.urlfan.com/site/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;urlfan ranks sites according to their popularity in the blogosphere and shows all their data.  It's a little more clear than both technorati and twingly when it comes to ranking websites, since thats what they focus on, and any blogger can lookup their website and see how they rank.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jimmy s</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 02:28:04 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>