<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>RotorBlog.com - Latest Comments in Twitter Goes to the Corporate World as Yammer</title><link>http://rotorblog.disqus.com/</link><description>Social media blog</description><atom:link href="https://rotorblog.disqus.com/twitter_goes_to_the_corporate_world_as_yammer/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 10:42:26 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Twitter Goes to the Corporate World as Yammer</title><link>http://www.rotorblog.com/2008/09/11/twitter-goes-to-the-corporate-world-as-yammer/#comment-11090005</link><description>&lt;p&gt;what a depressing win, if twitter adds a button called "groups" then yammer is gone by sheer virtue of installed user base (by this i mean the myriad applications that have sprung up on mobile devices and oses across the globe for twitter fans)...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;besides, i'm espousing the virtues of &lt;a href="http://yonkly.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="yonkly.com"&gt;yonkly.com&lt;/a&gt; for enterprise - it's open source and built on msft technologies, not php or ruby, much more logical choice for those interesting in experimenting&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;oddly, informationweek just did a survey on social networking in the enterprise, and nearly 80 percent aren't there yet though most are 'thinking about it' - so what's yammer after? 20 accounts at a dollar a month? dumb...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 10:42:26 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>